Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Abortion, Coercion, Health care, Healthcare, Obamacare, Political rhetoric, Political symbols
As Representative Pence ably demonstrated yesterday, in the sunset of House GOP opposition to healthcare reform (the bill passed with only one Republican vote, final text here), the GOP plans to build its healthcare endgame around the rhetoric of coercion:
The health care bill forces you to do X; it mandates Y; etc.
Set aside for a moment the question of how, exactly, an opt out public health care option forces anyone to do anything, ever. There’s only one party in this debate building their health care agenda around a desire to alter private behavior. And it’s not our guys.
As part of a compromise to see the bill to a successful conclusion, conservatives of both parties proposed and passed, along sectional lines, an amendment barring any public money from being used to pay for an abortion.
We can debate the morality of abortion until we’re blue in the face. But the simple fact is this: anti-abortion legislation, or legislation that prevents access to the same, constitutes an attempt to modify behavior by restricting options, plain and simple. The Stupak Amendment is a blatant attempt to use the power of the purse to prevent poorer women from exercising their full constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.
Nothing about the “public option” is coercive. By its very nature it provides, rather than restricts healthcare options. But morality-based restrictions on a government entitlement program are coercive, and are, in this case, aimed at preventing the exercise of a right that, regardless of its controversial status, remains grounded in constitutional law.
Choice is the essence of freedom, and the responsible exercise of available choices ought to be a question of good citizenship, not mandated morality. Yesterday, in passing the Stupak Amendment, a bipartisan coalition of reproductive rights foes legislated towards the morality of the few, rather than the liberty of the many. Don’t let them somehow claim the moral high ground.
From Natalie, erstwhile co-blogger (and all-around fantastic person):
As I’m sure you’ve all heard by now, there was a tragic shooting yesterday at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas. Until the start of the school year, one of my law school classmates worked in the Soldier Readiness Processing Center where the shootings occurred, and knew two of the victims, one of whom was killed and the other severely injured. He is trying to gather donations for the families of these two victims, making their lives a little easier in the face of this tragedy. If you have a little cash to spare, I encourage you to donate at his website (via PayPal):
Please help her out. Donate at http://forthoodtragedy.blogspot.com/.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Erick Erickson, Fundamentalism, Health care, Healthcare, Jerks, Obamacare, RedState, Republican Party, Tea parties
Finally confronted with the text of the House healthcare bill, Michelle Bachmann’s angry horde of “tea party” “activists” chose to tear up the bill, rather than read it.
Granted, tearing up legislation you’ve never read, but assume you won’t like, is a step up from mailing fake dog poop. So there’s that.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Bill Owens, Dede Scozzafava, Doug Hoffman, Media, Messaging, Mike Bloomberg, NY-23, Spam
Despite what was, to outside observers like myself, a “sexy” election, Tuesday’s special congressional election in New York’s 23rd district drew below-average turnout. Why? One thought:
While visiting the area, I heard two candidate ads on a local radio station in the space of 15 minutes. Both pushed the limits of decency. I talked to voters who left for work at 8:30 in the morning, and came home at 5:30 to seven voice mail messages — all candidate robocalls. The perception that Doug Hoffman was responsible for bringing this hellfire down on the 23rd district was palpable, unequivocally correct, and likely contributed to his loss, with overall turnout suffering in kind.
Thanks to newly re-elected Mayor Bloomberg, who also had a harder election night than he expected, citizens of the Five Boroughs will understand the sentiment (see above). Well-armed politicians should take note.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Erick Erickson, Fundamentalism, Racism, RedState
Late today, an army major, apparently disturbed by stories of the war abroad, murdered twelve of his comrades at Fort Hood. The man had a Arabic-sounding name, but stated “no religious preference” on his military paperwork. I’m sure you know what’s coming next:
As the sun set tonight, tragedy came to Ft. Hood. A muslim [sic] soldier began shooting other soldiers.
What we know so far is that the soldier was a muslim [sic] and began yelling at his fellow soldiers statements in Arabic.
Leave it to RedState to support our troops — by twisting their deaths for unrelated political gain.
Update: apparently he was Muslim. This changes nothing. His religion wasn’t relevant to the crime, except to permit pundits from Erickson to Malkin to blame his religion and Muslims generally.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Fantasy, Fundametnalism, Harry Potter, Science fiction
Lest we forget, in some circles, the Harry Potter series remains “controversial,” owing to a troublesome passage in the Bible. Firefly fans will recognize it: Excodus 22:18, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”
Aside from presenting real questions about the continued relevance of a literal reading of the Bible — because, really? — this passage apparently interferes with some Christians’ ability to enjoy compelling young adult literature, and the attendant cultural phenomenon, because the dust jacket of The Sorceror’s Stone plainly indicates a world where Exodus 22:18 is blissfully ignored. Like the Dursleys, fundamentalist Christians would prefer the orphaned Potter to stay in his closet where he belongs, thank you very much — and Dumbledore along with him.
To his enduring credit, one Benedictine monk is pushing back on that opinion from a Christian perspective, by, through apparently exegetical research, grounding Harry Potter’s moral lessons in Christian values. That’s not just fair, it’s overdue. The fundamental lessons of the Potter series center around acceptance, the importance of virtue, and the real, physical manifestations of love, all values that Christian theology espouses — even when some Christians do not.
This is objectively good for modern Christianity, and civil society: religions built around shutting the world out have a way of dying, but tend to drag parts of the secular world down with them. Still, accepting Harry Potter for its confluence with Christianity only would be a bad way of doing things — the literary equivalent of Huck Finn’s “I knowed [Jim] was white inside” — if it weren’t accompanied by this rejection of religiously-motivated isolationism:
I do not think there is any intelligent view out there that says these books are evil. They are the sort of objections that come from people who have not read them. What are they suggesting we do, ban everyone who turns up at a children’s party to do a few tricks?
I’ve said it once, and I’ll say it again: Christian fundamentalism isn’t just out of step with modernity. It’s out of step with its own roots.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Abortion, Bill Owens, Conseratism, Dede Scozzafava, Doug Hoffman, NY-23, NY-24, Republican Party
Except when it isn’t. One district over from the epicenter of Tuesday’s contentious special election, in the 24th, functionaries in both the Republican and Conservative parties will embrace pro-choice Republican Richard Hanna, who narrowly lost last year’s race, if he runs again in 2010.
There are a couple of ways to read that. Either Dede Scozzafava’s support for gay marriage is what broke her Conservative support, the 24th is more liberal and thus requires a lighter touch, or party officials are already re-evaluating their RINO-hunting strategy. I doubt it’s the latter, but man can dream.
Also, congratulations to all who passed the New York bar exam — including yours truly!
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Antonin Scalia, Fairness, Judicial activism, Jurisdiction, Law, William Brennan
Perspectives on the relationship between notions of “fairness” and “tradition,” from that favorite proxy battlefield for constitutional values — in personam jurisdiction.
See the full opinion text by pulling Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990). The question is whether obtaining personal jurisdiction over a defendant based only on his transient presence within the jurisdiction comports with constitutional guarantees of fairness. Justice Scalia answered for the majority in the affirmative — even when the events bringing the defendant into the jurisdiction were unrelated to the cause of action. After all, that’s the way it’s always been! Justice Brennan agreed, but found the manner in which Scalia reached that conclusion deeply disturbing: tradition, he argued, is no proxy for real fairness.
Fireworks ensued. Who you think has the better of this debate probably determines a lot of your worldview.
Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Censorship, First Amendment, Free speech, Keith Olbermann, Media, Sarah Palin
Details are out on the upcoming Sarah Palin Revival Tour, and so far, she’s only agreed to sit down with two non far-right press figures — Barbara Walters and Oprah Winfrey.
Recall that Sarah Palin’s definition of “censorship” includes any instance of disagreeing with her, or not letting her get away with hyper-partisan, distortionary rhetoric. So why is Sarah Palin censoring Keith Olbermann? Apparently, only Obama can cross the partisan media divide.
If you live there, you probably already know this — the north country, and especially the counties by the water, like Oswego and the surrounding area, are absolutely gorgeous. Some vignettes:




