<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democracy in America: Knowledge &amp; Elitism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/</link>
	<description>Democracy in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of the Liberals #65: Skepticism and Politics &#124; Neural Gourmet</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carnival of the Liberals #65: Skepticism and Politics &#124; Neural Gourmet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Of course, as Richard Hofstadter showed 40 odd years ago and Susan Jacoby demonstrates today, American society has a strong current of anti-intellectualism running through it. Submitted to a Candid World examines one facet of anti-intellectualism and tells us why knowledge isn&#8217;t elitist. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, as Richard Hofstadter showed 40 odd years ago and Susan Jacoby demonstrates today, American society has a strong current of anti-intellectualism running through it. Submitted to a Candid World examines one facet of anti-intellectualism and tells us why knowledge isn&#8217;t elitist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democracy in America: Factual Relativism on the Hillary Clinton Campaign &#171; Submitted to a Candid World</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Democracy in America: Factual Relativism on the Hillary Clinton Campaign &#171; Submitted to a Candid World]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently posted about the tendency of American politicians to, when confronted with proof that their policies are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently posted about the tendency of American politicians to, when confronted with proof that their policies are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dana!  I&#039;m glad you liked it.  I can&#039;t claim sole credit: I had the help of another writer, who I think will join the site and post in her own right soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dana!  I&#8217;m glad you liked it.  I can&#8217;t claim sole credit: I had the help of another writer, who I think will join the site and post in her own right soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Hunter</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 08:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not confusing in the least.  I understood it perfectly, myself, but then again, I&#039;d planned to write it!  LOL.  Well, something like it.  You did a better job than I would have, so thanks for doing all the hard work!  ;-)

Maybe it&#039;s time to start redefining democracy as people sharing their varied expertise in order to elect the person most capable of governing wisely, not a bunch of people basing their voting choices on which candidate makes them look smart in comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not confusing in the least.  I understood it perfectly, myself, but then again, I&#8217;d planned to write it!  LOL.  Well, something like it.  You did a better job than I would have, so thanks for doing all the hard work!  ;-)</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time to start redefining democracy as people sharing their varied expertise in order to elect the person most capable of governing wisely, not a bunch of people basing their voting choices on which candidate makes them look smart in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got the message right :-).  Perhaps I should rewrite it if it&#039;s confusing.  Apologies :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got the message right :-).  Perhaps I should rewrite it if it&#8217;s confusing.  Apologies :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Conservative</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/05/01/democracy-in-america-knowledge-elitism/#comment-2861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-2861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused. So is the message is that populism is part of the American tradition but we must be wary of taking it too far? If that is the case, then sure, I&#039;ll agree to that.

Both parties are guilty of using a populist message to drive voters away from the other party. Liberals talk about the evil, rich, fundamentalist conspiracy to take over the country. Conservatives moan about those elitist professors on college campuses, in Hollywood and in liberal bastions like San Francisco.

Populism is indeed part of the American experience and for the most part, a suspicion of those at the top is usually a good thing. But of course, like anything, it can be taken too far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. So is the message is that populism is part of the American tradition but we must be wary of taking it too far? If that is the case, then sure, I&#8217;ll agree to that.</p>
<p>Both parties are guilty of using a populist message to drive voters away from the other party. Liberals talk about the evil, rich, fundamentalist conspiracy to take over the country. Conservatives moan about those elitist professors on college campuses, in Hollywood and in liberal bastions like San Francisco.</p>
<p>Populism is indeed part of the American experience and for the most part, a suspicion of those at the top is usually a good thing. But of course, like anything, it can be taken too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

