Comments on: Beneficial Mutations in Bacteria, Wherein Conservapedia is Pwned, Take II: Andy Schlafly’s Lawyer Gambit Fails

By: Do Republicans want to teach "Astrology" in Public Schools? - Page 4 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Sun, 05 Jun 2011 07:05:54 +0000

[...] because if it does not evolve from a single bacteria it does not meet the description you posted. Beneficial Mutations in Bacteria, Wherein Conservapedia is Pwned, Take II: Andy Schlafly’s Law… Richard Lenski published a scientific study proving, again, that evolution can generate new [...]

By: grobley

grobley — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:43:17 +0000

schlafly is a creationist cunt.

By: In which I point to places on the internet « David Robertson

In which I point to places on the internet « David Robertson — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:27:24 +0000

[...] out about the work of Richard Lenski’s team a couple of years back, especially when he was harangued by a creationist who tried to sue him over the data he reported. So, this isn’t breaking news in science, but [...]

By: Irs Levy

Irs Levy — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:11:21 +0000

“For us laypeople, various good-minded scientist types can translate the reams into something meaningful.”

Yes – The “scientists” publish a lot of marterials all the time that go to the best sellers list to make a living. I assume they feel we “laymen” are able to understand the theories.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:08:37 +0000

Seems thats all the argument was about – Beneficial mutations lost the focus. There likely are no beneficial mutations in terms of evolving into a more useful organism, although the question is “what is useful”.

By: Voice in the Wilderness

Voice in the Wilderness — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:14 +0000

Larry “Dunghill” Fafarman states:

“Zachary can defend himself here, but I cannot defend myself on Carl Zimmer’s “The Loom” blog because I was kicked off for calling Zachary an “evasive jerk,” which he is.”

Others cannot defend themselves on either of your blogs. First is “I’m From Missouri”, otherwise known as Larry’s Cry Room, now contains only comments from two of Larry’s sock puppets, and the “Association of Non-Censoring Bloggers”, an organization with no members. Both are totally monitored and everything that disagrees with you is censored.

By: Schlafly v. Science, Round Six (?)

Schlafly v. Science, Round Six (?) — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:54:03 +0000

[...] with his latest defeat – the utter rejection of his complaints about a study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that demonstrated “positive” evolution & creation of new [...]

By: autofire372

autofire372 — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:12:15 +0000

Larry: “Another assumption in polite academic circles is that you don’t falsely accuse someone of something he didn’t do.”

So, Larry, when’re ya gonna get to taking that wonderful bit of your own advice?

By: Larry Fafarman

Larry Fafarman — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:38:49 +0000

Ames said,

–”Uhhh, demanding that you read what you’re critiquing before you critique it isn’t a bluff, or a strategy. “–

Uhhh, I wasn’t critiquing anything. I was just asking simple, basic questions.

–”It’s just an assumption in polite academic circles, apparently one that you don’t adhere to. “–

Another assumption in polite academic circles is that you don’t falsely accuse someone of something he didn’t do.

By: Ames

Ames — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:21:47 +0000

Uhhh, demanding that you read what you’re critiquing before you critique it isn’t a bluff, or a strategy. It’s just an assumption in polite academic circles, apparently one that you don’t adhere to.