<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Open Thread on Donofrio v. Wells, cert. denied, 55_ U.S. ___ (2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/</link>
	<description>Democracy in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli: For the Supreme Court, a Curious Kind of Transition &#171; Submitted to a Candid World</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-10844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli: For the Supreme Court, a Curious Kind of Transition &#171; Submitted to a Candid World]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-10844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] went as far as to push a poorly-pled lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, where it was presumed rejected as of Friday rejected. For real court-watchers, though, Friday&#8217;s news was much bigger, with significantly [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] went as far as to push a poorly-pled lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, where it was presumed rejected as of Friday rejected. For real court-watchers, though, Friday&#8217;s news was much bigger, with significantly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli: For the Supreme Court, a Curious Kind of Transition</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli: For the Supreme Court, a Curious Kind of Transition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] went as far as to push a poorly-pled lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, where it was presumed rejected as of Friday. For real court-watchers, though, Friday&#8217;s news was much bigger, with significantly more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] went as far as to push a poorly-pled lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, where it was presumed rejected as of Friday. For real court-watchers, though, Friday&#8217;s news was much bigger, with significantly more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was wondering that myself! It looks like Arthur appointed Justices Blatchford and Gray. Their appointments were clearly invalid; ironically, Justice Gray wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark,&lt;/a&gt; which the Obama denialists rely upon heavily. Since Gray was invalid, that opinion, which he wrote is also invalid. So, oddly, maybe Arthur WAS a citizen, meaning... owww. My head....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering that myself! It looks like Arthur appointed Justices Blatchford and Gray. Their appointments were clearly invalid; ironically, Justice Gray wrote <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark" rel="nofollow">U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark,</a> which the Obama denialists rely upon heavily. Since Gray was invalid, that opinion, which he wrote is also invalid. So, oddly, maybe Arthur WAS a citizen, meaning&#8230; owww. My head&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blkcfy</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blkcfy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wondering.  Is Donofrio of the opinion that we will need to review (and rescind) every decision, act and &quot;illegally&quot; official action of the four US Presidents born after the Constitution who had a foreign born parent?  Or is this just limited to President-elect Obama?  Or did he even consider the consequences of this specious argument?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering.  Is Donofrio of the opinion that we will need to review (and rescind) every decision, act and &#8220;illegally&#8221; official action of the four US Presidents born after the Constitution who had a foreign born parent?  Or is this just limited to President-elect Obama?  Or did he even consider the consequences of this specious argument?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gulik</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gulik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lern 2 spell, n00b.

(Seriously.  Spellcheck is your friend.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lern 2 spell, n00b.</p>
<p>(Seriously.  Spellcheck is your friend.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuda</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cuda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol Didn&#039;t McCain have to show proof of eligibility? The panama canal thing,right? Dont remember him hiring four law firms to get that bad boy and prove his eligibility,Do you? Ames? Comment number 8 seems so sure this will all be cleared up by Barrack.In fact he is so sure he just can&#039;t understand why Barrack should have to show a B.C. even if McCain did.After all Barrack is the Massia now isn&#039;t he ames?(Who comes first the messia or the antimessia Ames?:)
Oh hell Ames is more than likely real ignorant or just doin his job lol.

Funny how I need A B.C. to renew my D.L. but bucko needs squat to be prez.Wake up dumb ass&#039;s

Red :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol Didn&#8217;t McCain have to show proof of eligibility? The panama canal thing,right? Dont remember him hiring four law firms to get that bad boy and prove his eligibility,Do you? Ames? Comment number 8 seems so sure this will all be cleared up by Barrack.In fact he is so sure he just can&#8217;t understand why Barrack should have to show a B.C. even if McCain did.After all Barrack is the Massia now isn&#8217;t he ames?(Who comes first the messia or the antimessia Ames?:)<br />
Oh hell Ames is more than likely real ignorant or just doin his job lol.</p>
<p>Funny how I need A B.C. to renew my D.L. but bucko needs squat to be prez.Wake up dumb ass&#8217;s</p>
<p>Red :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James F</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Executive summary: nothing will convince them. We’ll be hearing about this for years.&lt;/i&gt;

Indeed.  The folks who think Oswald wasn&#039;t the only gunman show no signs of stopping - going strong since 1963; the Moon landing hoax crowd, 1969.  As Phil Plait said, it won&#039;t matter if we have a Moon colony in the future, they&#039;ll still claim the first landing was staged.  The 9/11 Truthers have settled down to a dull roar since 2001, but they&#039;re as deeply entrenched as any of them, especially on Facebook and other internet communities.  Long after you and I have passed on, there will be some Birthers, somewhere, insisting the Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Executive summary: nothing will convince them. We’ll be hearing about this for years.</i></p>
<p>Indeed.  The folks who think Oswald wasn&#8217;t the only gunman show no signs of stopping &#8211; going strong since 1963; the Moon landing hoax crowd, 1969.  As Phil Plait said, it won&#8217;t matter if we have a Moon colony in the future, they&#8217;ll still claim the first landing was staged.  The 9/11 Truthers have settled down to a dull roar since 2001, but they&#8217;re as deeply entrenched as any of them, especially on Facebook and other internet communities.  Long after you and I have passed on, there will be some Birthers, somewhere, insisting the Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scruz- he&#039;s not. He has counsel for the campaign, but they haven&#039;t put any work into the Berg/Donofrio cases. He didn&#039;t even defend in either case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scruz- he&#8217;s not. He has counsel for the campaign, but they haven&#8217;t put any work into the Berg/Donofrio cases. He didn&#8217;t even defend in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scruzman</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scruzman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is probably qualified, but why would he spend $1,000,000. on lawyers to keep the BC  secret? What is he hiding?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is probably qualified, but why would he spend $1,000,000. on lawyers to keep the BC  secret? What is he hiding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James F</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2008/12/05/open-thread-on-donofrio-v-wells-cert-denied-55_-us-___-2008/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acandidworld.net/?p=4113#comment-8303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama has already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vws9fTtQgz4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;appeased the Superman fans.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has already <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vws9fTtQgz4" rel="nofollow">appeased the Superman fans.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

