Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics, Religion | Tags: Culture wars, Religious politics
Several years back, Bill O’Reilly unfortunately discovered that, for certain subsets of the population, conflict and persecution sell better than love and inclusion. In a sad attempt to pander to this demographic, O’Reilly invented the “war on Christmas,” the central theory of which is that the religious pluralism inflicted upon America by (God help us) “different” people impermissibly generalizes the holiday season, tragically displacing mentions of Jesus in retail outlets and common conversation in favor of abstracted benedictions like “happy holidays.” To the Culture Warrior, this replacement, by failing to mention Him specifically, is a sin against God.
O’Reilly never makes the allegation that this diminishment of public Christianity somehow interferes with private worship, or that it dilutes the simple beauty of the season – family, friends, love, togetherness, “peace on Earth, goodwill to men.” Nor could he. If there is a casualty in the “War on Christmas,” it is neither peace on earth, nor goodwill to men, but only Christianity’s perceived right to be the exclusive bringer of these emotions. The “War on Christmas” isn’t about values, Christian or otherwise: it’s just a new way to couch simpering whines about the loss of Christian hegemony in the rhetoric of discrimination.
Seemingly lost on O’Reilly, too, is the ridiculous irony of fighting a “War on Christmas” to defend holiday cheer. To dispense anger, scorn, and ill-will in defense of Christian primacy is like valuing the messenger above the message, or putting the sleigh before the magically-illuminated reindeer. What matters in the holiday season isn’t how it’s celebrated, but that it’s celebrated. By turning Christmas into another venue for asserting Christian complaints about their lost spotlight, O’Reilly forgets the real “reason for the season,” which is neither the Republican Party, nor conservatism, nor Christianity, nor even Jesus Christ, but rather the peace, happiness, and exhortations to human brotherhood that together amount to Jesus’ enduring message. By effectively weaponizing the holiday season, O’Reilly ends up working a far greater subversion of the holiday season than any blasé Jesus-less Walmart benediction ever could.
Before partisans like O’Reilly clamor for all of America to celebrate Jesus in their words, they would do well to first remember his words in their hearts. Expanding the Culture War is no way to celebrate the season of peace. Only rarely does someone miss the point so spectacularly.
7 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Well said.
Comment by Martin December 24, 2008 @ 9:36 amtotally, ames.
If there is a casualty in the “War on Christmas,” it is neither peace on earth, nor goodwill to men, but only Christianity’s perceived right to be the exclusive bringer of these emotions. The “War on Christmas” isn’t about values, Christian or otherwise: it’s just a new way to couch simpering whines about the loss of Christian hegemony in the rhetoric of discrimination.
moving and fun to read!
Comment by didionsmommy December 24, 2008 @ 1:50 pmVery nice.
What’s so funny is that, even with all the alleged “slights” against Christians during this time, people say Merry Christmas all the time!
Liberals, conservatives…everybody.
The lady on the phone at GEICO said “Merry Christmas” to me a little while ago. The lady who checked me out at the grocery store in my little liberal oasis in the middle of the South said “Merry Christmas.”
The only ones that are fun to screw with are the ones that play victim. There’s this western-wear store out in the suburbs that runs a ridiculous commercial every year where a clown bitches and moans about how “people aren’t allowed to say Merry Christmas anymore” and then offers a discount to anyone who says it before the transaction is rung up.
Western store? Asking for it. Hopefully my best friend and I will have time to do a little last minute Christmas shopping there later today, wherein we accumulate a gigantic purchase of cowboy boots and other hootenanny gear, then suddenly realize once at the check-out that this is “that store that does those ads.” When they say “yip yip that’s us all raht!”, we plan to simply get a disappointed look on our faces and explain that “we don’t have any problem with Christmas, but my boyfriend here and I are Jewish [we are both gay dudes, though not boyfriends] and we celebrate Christmas, but found that really offensive so I’m sorry, we can’t make this $5,000 purchase, anyway bye.”
If we have time, I think it’s worth the hilarity.
Comment by Evan December 24, 2008 @ 1:58 pmThanks everyone! Evan, PLEASE do that too. If you can, wear a wire :-), and post it to your site.
Comment by Ames December 24, 2008 @ 3:49 pmI don’t think any of you realize how dangerous saying “happy holidays” can be. I said it to the salvation army santa the other day an his head exploded into a cloud of tinsel and sugar cookies. Or maybe that was an eggnog induced hullucination. Anyway, my point is drink more eggnog cause there won’t be any for another year.
Comment by Jello December 25, 2008 @ 1:09 am[...] I realize that people regard the use of “Happy Holidays” as a generic substitute for “Merry [...]
Pingback by …On “Happy Holidays.” « “That you may ruminate” December 29, 2008 @ 8:58 pm[...] betrays their own conception of the holiday, and the best part of the entire season, by instigating unnecessary conflict, rather than actually striving for “peace on [...]
Pingback by Selfishness & the “War on Christmas” « Submitted to a Candid World December 24, 2009 @ 2:58 pm