Comments on: Vitter: “No Idea” if Loving v. Virginia Rightly Decided

By: Mike from Ottawa

Mike from Ottawa — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:43:49 +0000

Now we can imagine why.

I think “infer” is warranted.

By: Break the Terror (Evan)

Break the Terror (Evan) — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:11:34 +0000

*chuckle*

It’s strange, because at ANY time, it would be pathetic for a sitting senator to have trouble recalling Loving. But, when there has just been an incident in YOUR state which violates that very ruling, an incident which has gotten a lot of press…

Unbelievable.

I’m also curious how healthcare is taking up so much of his time, since the only thing Diapers and his buddies are doing is saying NO repeatedly.

By: ACG

ACG — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:03:52 +0000

I would hope they would… and I think they should… but I’m trying to be realistic :). Unfortunately, people don’t know as much about these things as they probably should. It scares me, Mike — I just love my country. And I fear for her.

:’-(

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:46:39 +0000

I wouldn’t expect a sitting Senator to be able to tell me what he thought of Lochner v. New York, or even Kelo v. City of New London.

You think? I mean, I own up to being a major wonk, if an amateur, but I’d say those were serious business…