<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deficits and Prosperity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acandidworld.com/2010/02/09/deficits-and-prosperity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acandidworld.com/2010/02/09/deficits-and-prosperity/</link>
	<description>Democracy in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErikaF</title>
		<link>http://acandidworld.com/2010/02/09/deficits-and-prosperity/#comment-17393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ErikaF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acandidworld.com/?p=11212#comment-17393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deficit-screamers seem to have basic misconceptions about gov&#039;t and deficits. The gov&#039;t is not, and cannot, be run like personal finances or a small business (where deficits are an immediate worry), or even a global business (the business must make money to be valuable). Rather the gov&#039;t is more akin to non-profit enterprise that most of the country uses. As such, a deficit (within reason) is not a huge concern. The deficit as it is now, of course, is a large concern, and must be dealt with in the close future. 

Unlike businesses, which invest in people and infrastructure in the upturns, gov&#039;t must invest in the downturns. Gov&#039;t must spend money to shore up the consumers/contributors (that&#039;s the general public) so that the contributors can continue to provide funds to the gov&#039;t. If folks cannot find jobs, they cannot send money to the gov&#039;t, which means that the gov&#039;t will not have money (even with the deficit) to send back in terms of benefits and infrastructure spending. 

It&#039;s a situation that&#039;s opposite from normal business behavior. Simply put, the gov&#039;t must extend its credit for the short-term to build up the base so that later, long-term, the spending and credit can be curtailed and the deficit reduced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deficit-screamers seem to have basic misconceptions about gov&#8217;t and deficits. The gov&#8217;t is not, and cannot, be run like personal finances or a small business (where deficits are an immediate worry), or even a global business (the business must make money to be valuable). Rather the gov&#8217;t is more akin to non-profit enterprise that most of the country uses. As such, a deficit (within reason) is not a huge concern. The deficit as it is now, of course, is a large concern, and must be dealt with in the close future. </p>
<p>Unlike businesses, which invest in people and infrastructure in the upturns, gov&#8217;t must invest in the downturns. Gov&#8217;t must spend money to shore up the consumers/contributors (that&#8217;s the general public) so that the contributors can continue to provide funds to the gov&#8217;t. If folks cannot find jobs, they cannot send money to the gov&#8217;t, which means that the gov&#8217;t will not have money (even with the deficit) to send back in terms of benefits and infrastructure spending. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a situation that&#8217;s opposite from normal business behavior. Simply put, the gov&#8217;t must extend its credit for the short-term to build up the base so that later, long-term, the spending and credit can be curtailed and the deficit reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

