Attorney General Holder answered the Fifth Circuit’s odd letter of concern with a statement supporting the notion of judicial review — obviously — but noting that a presumption of constitutionality attaches to acts of Congress, except in rare cases. Conservative sites spin this as surprising, and a pitch to Justice Kennedy. It’s… not. Unless laws implicate fundamental rights, or classify on the basis of a suspect class (race), they are presumed to be constitutional. To the extent that this is an answer to Justice Kennedy’s question about the government’s “heavy burden,” it’s uncontroversial, and one he’ll be expecting.
Briefly noted
Progressive political thought and a reaffirmation of the foundational values of equal justice and reason.
Tip, praise, criticism? Write, we'll read.
Tip, praise, criticism? Write, we'll read.
Democracy in America
- The famous "Piss Christ" was not intended to be insulting. That means @glennbeck isn't doing satire, he's just a dick. tinyurl.com/bsfrqg2 5 months ago
- @Stranahan GOP shuns crazy? Oh like @glennbeck and @realDonaldTrump? @DrOrlyTaitzEsq? 5 months ago
- RT @Mudflats: @SenJohnMcCain RT @SarahPalinUSA: Results whether good or bad come from the choices we make. Choose wisely. 5 months ago
- @CoronaRay @realdonaldtrump You forget, in the Romney/Ryan/Rand era, selling out your countrymen for a quick buck is a patriotic virtue! 5 months ago
- RT @Wonkette: Meet Alaska's Airport And Harbor To Nowhere bit.ly/WHgQE0 5 months ago
THANK YOU for posting this! Always love visiting – keep up the great work!
Steve
Common Cents
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com
ps. Link Exchange??