Tag Archives: Individual mandate

heartofatlanta

For Federal Power, Does the Mechanism Matter?

If, come June, the Supreme Court decides to strike down ObamaCare’s individual mandate, they’ll accomplish something almost unique in the Court’s history, but not for the reason you think. We expect the Court to strike down unconstitutional laws; even conservatives agree with that proposition (for now). What we don’t often see is a Supreme Court willing to invalidate a […]

marbury-wordle

In Partial Defense of David Dow: Maybe Don’t Impeach the Five

On the Daily Beast, Professor David Dow — a brilliant man and storied advocate against the death penalty — argues that President Obama should consider impeaching Supreme Court justices, if the Court votes to invalidate the individual mandate. I respectfully disagree: for one, even if Thomas Jefferson considered the same, Jefferson was a bit of […]

POSTER_7B

The People as Limiting Principle

The Volokh Conspiracy notes Justice Breyer’s aspirational nod to the last, best limiting principle in constitutional law: And, of course, the greatest limiting principle of all, which not too many accept, so I’m not going to emphasize that, is the limiting principle derived from the fact that members of Congress are elected from States and […]

That Said, Why Did Conventional Wisdom Fail?

Let’s assume that Tuesday’s argument on the individual mandate wasn’t what any reasonable proponent should’ve expected, and that the Justice’s questions are cause for alarm. Why was every serious legal academician wrong? Two reasons. First, this is a Supreme Court that’s defied convention again and again, making them the most “activist” and conservative Court in recent memory. Neither […]

IMG_1614

ObamaCare: The Sky Is Not Falling

Around about 1 P.M. yesterday, the world collectively and rather seriously lost its mind. Jeff Toobin took to the air to proclaim the end of ObamaCare, the death of the modern Commerce Clause, and war and confusion generally; InTrade shares on ObamaCare’s death soared to 59%; and Lyle Denniston, who unlike Jeff Toobin has actually argued appellate […]

empty supreme court

The Non-Recusal Tradition

Conservatives and the New York Times may agree on one thing: it’s time for the Supreme Court to get serious about producing a framework where Justices can, and do, regularly recuse themselves from matters in which they’ve had an interest. For my part, I disagree. Though there’s a better case to be made for Thomas’ […]

steamship-marion

“Obama vs. the Commerce Clause”: an Answer to Richard Epstein

Unlike your average Tea Party “scholar,” who’s managed to convince himself that child labor laws are somehow an ungodly restriction on individual liberty, Professor Richard Epstein is a profoundly intelligent man. Which is why I take his constitutional arguments against ObamaCare deathly seriously. Epstein isn’t one to fantasize about a world where Lochner v. New […]

209544-supreme-court-chamber_original

Reading the Supreme Court’s Grant in the “ObamaCare” Litigation

SCOTUSblog offers full analysis of the Court’s order (PDF) granting certiorari, to which we add only limited points. First, take into consideration the length of the argument — five and a half hours, broken over several days: The allotment of 5 1/2 hours for oral argument appeared to be a modern record; the most recent […]

Still More Cheering

Early in The West Wing, a newly invigorated President Bartlett abandons the key phrase in his planned State of the Union address — “the era of big government is over,” previously intoned by President Clinton — for a more complicated sell. “Government can be a place where people come together and where no one gets […]

The Eleventh Circuit on “ObamaCare”: How the Tea Party Actually Lost

See others’ take on the same. Set aside the Court’s holding that the individual mandate represents an inappropriate expansion of the Commerce Clause — to which this is a proper rejoinder.  Instead, when reading the monolithic opinion (pdf), take note of Section III.B, which begins on page 55, and rejects the Plaintiffs’ attempt to read […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 678 other followers